![]() Although the actions of the controllers did not directly contribute to the pilot’s loss of control while attempting to fly under VFR in IMC, the controllers did not act in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidance that dictates how to assist pilots experiencing this type of emergency. The pilot described that she was operating in conditions that limited her ability to navigate and potentially affected her ability to control the airplane under visual flight rules (VFR). Review of autopsy results and postaccident toxicological testing showed no evidence of any physiologically induced incapacitation or other impairment.ĭuring the sequence of events leading up to the accident, the pilot communicated with two air traffic controllers. She also did not display the ability to adequately communicate her situation to the controller, nor did she seem to understand or comply with the assistance offered to her. ![]() These factors would have reduced the pilot’s ability to perceive the natural horizon and increased her risk of spatial disorientation.Īlthough the pilot held an instrument rating and had recently completed an instrument proficiency check, on the night of the accident, she did not demonstrate the skills necessary to control an airplane in IMC. The flight was conducted on a dark, moonless night, under an overcast ceiling, and the final portion of the flight was over the ocean. The level of damage and fragmentation of the wreckage was consistent with ground impact at a high velocity. A short time later, radar and radio contact were lost the airplane had crashed. The controller then observed the airplane on radar at 600 ft and descending and directed the pilot to climb and turn. About 7 minutes into the flight, the pilot likely encountered instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) and requested assistance from air traffic control.Īn air traffic controller attempted to provide the pilot with radar vectors to a nearby airport however, the pilot was unable to visually acquire that airport. The accident flight was initiated at night, presumably with the intent of operating in the local airport traffic pattern. On the day of the accident, she flew an undetermined number of local, solo flights without the knowledge of the operator. However, she possessed the keys to the airplane since she had flown the previous day with an instructor, but he did not approve her for solo flight because he believed she required additional practice landing the airplane with an instructor onboard. According to the operator, the pilot did not complete the mandatory checkout. The commercial pilot was in the process of purchasing a block of flight time with the intent of building time toward an additional rating. ![]() Defining Event: Loss of control in flightįlight Conducted Under: Part 91: General Aviation - Personal
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |